Employment dismissal justified by job cuts even if employee did not directly perform cut tasks.

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement and severance pay after the employer terminated his contract due to workforce reduction. The court found that the reduction in staff was a valid organizational and economic reason for dismissal, even though the specific tasks the employee no longer performed were not directly his responsibility. Consequently, the court held that the employer's decision to dismiss based on these criteria was lawful and the lower court did not err in its assessment.