Supreme Court dismissed cassation; teacher's fixed-term contract was less favorable than mandatory appointment under Teacher's Card. The court found no legal error in the lower court's assessment of the teacher's employment conditions and intent.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a teacher against a labor court judgment establishing her employment relationship based on a fixed-term contract rather than a mandatory appointment. The teacher argued that the lower court incorrectly applied the Teacher's Card Act, claiming the fixed-term arrangement was less favorable than the statutory requirement for a permanent appointment. The court ruled that the lower court correctly assessed the specific circumstances, including the employer's capacity and the teacher's own lack of interest in a permanent position, thereby validating the less favorable contract.