Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 12/99 AI generated

Supreme Court rules that dismissal from a press spokesperson role does not terminate the supplementary allowance if the main appointment remains valid.

Case Number III ZP 12/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a prosecutor's supplementary allowance for a press spokesperson role ended upon immediate dismissal from that specific function. The prosecutor argued that dismissal without a notice period should terminate the allowance, while the prosecution contended the main employment relationship remained intact. The court held that the supplementary allowance is tied to the period of performing the function, not the termination of the function itself, provided the main appointment persists.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 5 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 14 marca 1994 r. w sprawie wynagrodzeń prokuratorów; supplementary allowance for a specific function is payable during the period of its performance and does not cease immediately upon dismissal from that function if the main appointment remains valid.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor supplementary allowance press spokesperson function dismissal without notice public servant employment termination of function statutory remuneration administrative dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 5 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 14 marca 1994 r. w sprawie wynagrodzeń prokuratorów oraz asesorów i aplikantów prokuratury
art. 390 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text