II UKN 341/99
AI generated
Parents managing a child's farm are not considered farmers conducting business on their own account.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a decision terminating a farmer's social insurance coverage. The insured father continued managing a farm transferred to his minor son, arguing he was a dependent owner under civil law. The court ruled that managing a child's property constitutes administration of another's assets, not independent business conduct.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 336 KC; Art. 101 § 1 KRiO; Art. 338 KC: Managing a farm belonging to a minor child under parental authority does not constitute conducting agricultural activity on one's own account, as the manager acts as a tenant rather than an owner.
Keywords
AI generated
social insurance for farmers
dependent ownership status
parental authority management
agricultural activity definition
tenant vs owner distinction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 336 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 101 § 1 Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego
Art. 338 Kodeksu cywilnego