Delay in social insurance status determination does not justify disciplinary warning if employee was recently rewarded.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a social insurance fund against a female employee regarding three disciplinary warnings. The lower courts found that the delays in determining insurance status and executing court judgments were not solely the employee's fault, noting she had been rewarded for proper performance shortly before the sanctions. The court upheld the second-instance judgment, ruling that the warnings were disproportionate given the employee's recent recognition and the complex circumstances of the delays.