Supreme Court rules farmer receiving rehabilitation benefits after employment termination must pay social insurance contributions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal, overturning a lower court decision that exempted her from social insurance contributions. The court found that while the applicant received rehabilitation benefits after terminating her employment contract, this period did not constitute 'subjection to another social insurance' under the relevant statute. Consequently, the farmer remained obligated to pay contributions for the period following the termination of her prior employment relationship.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 6 pkt 13 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa; A farmer receiving rehabilitation benefits after terminating an employment contract remains subject to mandatory farmer social insurance and must pay contributions, as the benefit period does not exempt them from the obligation.