Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employer terminated probationary contract validly due to employee's work errors.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the labor court's decision to terminate her employment contract. The plaintiff argued that the employer violated Article 32 of the Labor Code by terminating a fixed-term contract, while the employer cited the plaintiff's administrative errors and failure to inform the employer as grounds for dismissal. The court ruled that the employer did not violate Article 32 by exercising its right to terminate a fixed-term contract and that the termination was justified under Article 45 due to the plaintiff's work misconduct.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 § 1 KP; Art. 45 KP: An employer may not violate Article 32 § 1 of the Labor Code when terminating a fixed-term or probationary employment contract, as such termination is a lawful exercise of statutory rights provided for these specific contract types.