Negligence must be flagrant to exempt employer liability; mere speed or panic does not suffice.

The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's dismissal of the claimant's invalidity pension request regarding a workplace accident. The court found that while the claimant drove at an excessive speed and panicked, his specific error was a technical mishandling of the vehicle while returning to the road, not a flagrant breach of traffic rules. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer was not exempt from liability because the claimant's actions did not reach the threshold of gross negligence or intent required by law.