I PKN 345/99
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed union appeal; collective agreement interpretation excludes non-supervisors from functional allowance.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the union's cassation appeal regarding functional allowances for shift supervisors at a coal mine. The court found that the collective agreement explicitly excluded employees who did not supervise others from receiving the allowance, a fact the lower courts correctly established. Consequently, the union's claim that the agreement should be interpreted differently was rejected based on the clear intent of the parties.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 2411 pkt 2 KP; Art. 2416 § 1 KP: Collective agreements are interpreted based on the common will and intent of the parties, excluding those who do not fulfill the specific supervisory duties defined therein.
Keywords
AI generated
collective agreement interpretation
functional allowance entitlement
supervisory duties requirement
party intent in labor law
dismissal of cassation appeal
labor dispute outcome
coal mine employment terms
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 2411 pkt 2 KP
Art. 2416 § 1 KP
art. 5 ZUZ
art. 12 of the collective agreement
art. 393 KPC
art. 2417 § 6 k.p
art. 2415 § 2 k.p