Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 96/99 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes administrative court ruling for failing to hear parties on signature validity before closing proceedings.

Case Number III RN 96/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the lower court's decision due to a procedural violation regarding the validity of an appeal signature. The lower court declared the appeal invalid because it was allegedly unsigned by the appellants, despite the original document being signed and the appellants personally attending the hearing. The court ruled that under the relevant procedural code, the lower court was obligated to give the parties an opportunity to clarify this specific issue before closing the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 224 § 1 KPC; Art. 59 ust. 1 ustawy o NSA: Before closing proceedings, the court must give parties an opportunity to clarify facts regarding the validity of procedural documents if such doubt exists.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative procedure signature validity hearing obligation procedural defect supreme court review appeal filing court duty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 224 § 1 KPC
art. 59 ust. 1 ustawy o NSA
art. 21 i art. 22 ust. 3 ustawy o NSA
art. 63 § 3 KPA
art. 127 § 1 i § 2 KPA
art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 KPA
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text