Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III RN 133/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review; city council lacked authority to approve parking fee zones under traffic organization law.

Case Number III RN 133/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Minister of Justice against a city council's decision to establish paid parking zones. The city council argued for expanded authority to approve traffic organization projects, but the court found this interpretation exceeded statutory limits. The court ruled that parking fees are a distinct legal matter reserved for traffic management authorities, not general traffic organization tasks delegated to municipalities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 2 lit. a) ustawy z dnia 24 listopada 1995 r. o zmianie zakresu działania niektórych miast oraz o miejskich strefach usług publicznych; Art. 13 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 21 marca 1985 r. o drogach publicznych; The task of approving traffic organization projects does not include the introduction of parking fees, which remain the exclusive competence of the traffic management authority.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review dismissal municipal administrative competence parking fee regulation traffic organization law statutory interpretation limits administrative jurisdiction public road fees

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 2 lit. a) of the Act of 24 November 1995 on changing the scope of activity of certain cities and on municipal public service zones
Art. 13 ust. 2 pkt 4 of the Act of 21 March 1985 on public roads
Art. 24 ust. 1 of the Act on the Supreme Administrative Court
Art. 94 ust. 1 and 2 of the Act of 8 March 1990 on territorial self-government
Art. 393 § 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
SA/Wr 660/92
SA/Gd 23369/95

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text