II UKN 174/99
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when grounds for retrial are formally cited but factually absent in the complaint's reasoning.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's rejection of a retrial request. The applicant formally invoked statutory grounds for retrial but failed to substantiate them, as the reasoning explicitly showed the alleged lack of representation and procedural defects did not exist. The court ruled that merely citing the correct legal basis without factual support renders the complaint inadmissible under the relevant procedural code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 401-404 KPC; Art. 410 § 1 KPC: A complaint for retrial is inadmissible if, despite formally citing statutory grounds, the reasoning clearly demonstrates that the alleged grounds for retrial do not exist.
Keywords
AI generated
retrial grounds
inadmissible complaint
procedural defect
lack of representation
cassation appeal
procedural code
substantive support
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 401-404 KPC
art. 410 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 12 in fine KPC
art. 407 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedorzeczenie z dnia 21 czerwca 1961 r., 3 CR 953/60
wyrok z dnia 20 stycznia 1966 r., II PR 371/65
wyrok z dnia 14 czerwca 1968 r., I CR 432/67
wyrok z dnia 10 lipca 1974 r., II CR 331/74
wyrok z dnia 2 kwietnia 1998 r., I PKN 521/97
wyrok z dnia 1 października 1998 r., I PKN 359/98
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 29 stycznia 1968 r., I CZ 122/67
uzasadnienie uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 października 1981 r., I CO 5/81
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 30 maja 1996 r., I CRN 101/95
I CRN 101/95