Cassation dismissed for lack of specific facts regarding patent effects and procedural errors in cost rulings.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Jerzy B. against the Second Instance Court's judgment in a patent remuneration dispute. The appellant claimed procedural violations regarding the assessment of patent effects and the handling of court costs, but failed to provide concrete facts supporting these allegations. The court rejected the claims because the cassation petition lacked specific details on the alleged statutory breaches and noted that cost rulings are accessory decisions not subject to cassation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 98 ust. 3 ustawy o wynalazczości; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 316 § 1 KPC; Art. 364 § 2 KPC; Art. 392 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if it fails to specify facts regarding statutory violations, and accessory rulings on court costs cannot be challenged via cassation.