Employer's need under Labor Code does not cover changing employee duties due to health status.

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against the labor court's decision to reject his request for reinstatement to armed guard duties. The employee argued that the employer's need for armed guards did not justify changing his job due to medical restrictions, while the employer relied on medical certificates to reassign him to unarmed duties. The court ruled that the employer's decision was lawful based on medical evidence and that procedural defects in the lower court did not warrant cassation intervention.