I PKN 292/99
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation for failure to cite specific regulations and misapplied labor law provisions regarding travel allowances.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by three employees against a labor court judgment regarding their travel allowances. The employees argued that higher rates from a 1994 regulation should apply to their vocational training abroad, while the employer contended the 1974 regulation governed their situation. The court ruled that the appeal failed because it cited general regulations without specifying the exact articles allegedly violated, which is required by procedural law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3931 KPC; Art. 3933 KPC: A cassation appeal must cite specific legal provisions; general references to acts or vague allegations of violation without identifying the exact articles are inadmissible and must be disregarded by the Supreme Court.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
specific provisions
labor law
travel allowances
procedural requirements
inadmissible appeal
labor court
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 3931 KPC
art. 3933 KPC
art. 18 KP
art. 8 KP
art. 78 KP
art. 29 KP
art. 25