Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissible cassation where time extension request fails due to lack of procedural consequences.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a cassation request and a subsequent request to restore the filing deadline. The appellant argued that the case involved legal questions regarding pension calculation rather than a monetary claim, and that a deadline extension should not depend on the admissibility of the cassation itself. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the cassation was rejected due to the value of the subject matter being below the statutory threshold, meaning the time extension request had no procedural consequences under the Civil Procedure Code.