I PKN 267/99
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; collective wage increase law does not grant individual equal raise rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a regional court's rejection of his wage equalization claim. The employee argued that collective agreements and specific statutes mandated an identical wage increase for all staff, but the court found no such individual right. The decision established that the relevant legislation only regulates average wage increases for employers, leaving individual wage adjustments to general labor law principles.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4 ust. 1 i 4 ustawy z dnia 16 grudnia 1994 r. o negocjacyjnym systemie kształtowania przyrostu przeciętnych wynagrodzeń; The statutory provision regulating average wage increases does not create a claim for an individual employee to receive an equal wage raise.
Keywords
AI generated
collective bargaining agreements
average wage increase
individual wage claim
labor law interpretation
wage equalization dispute
cassation appeal dismissal
employer wage policy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4 ust. 1 i 4 ustawy z dnia 16 grudnia 1994 r. o negocjacyjnym systemie kształtowania przyrostu przeciętnych wynagrodzeń u przedsiębiorców oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
art. 78 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
art. 13 Kodeksu pracy
§ 2 porozumienia z 28 lutego 1997 r.
§ 2 porozumienia z 28 lutego 1998 r.
art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
art. 39312 KPC
art. 102 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PR 105/75, OSNCP 1996 z. 6, poz. 145