Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UKN 95/99 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; questioning factual findings does not equal requesting new evidence under Polish Code of Civil Procedure.

Case Number II UKN 95/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Lech S. against a Social Insurance Office decision denying early retirement. The applicant argued that the appellate court violated procedural rules by failing to conduct a full evidentiary analysis and by not addressing specific witness testimonies from the first instance. The court ruled that merely questioning factual findings in an appeal does not constitute a request for new evidence or a violation of procedural statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 328 § 2 KPC; Art. 381 KPC; Art. 217 § 2 KPC; Art. 391 KPC; Art. 385 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC: Questioning factual findings in an appeal does not equate to submitting a request for new evidence, nor does it constitute a procedural violation warranting cassation.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal factual findings review evidence request requirement procedural violation standard social insurance retirement agricultural work definition appellate court duties

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 328 § 2 KPC
Art. 381 KPC
Art. 217 § 2 KPC
Art. 391 KPC
Art. 385 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 5 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text