Supreme Court quashes lower court ruling for misinterpreting corporate board resolution intent under Civil Code.

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for retrial regarding a dispute over a bonus payment. The plaintiff argued that the supervisory board's resolution was ambiguous, while the lower court incorrectly prioritized the board's subjective intent over the plaintiff's reasonable understanding. The court ruled that the objective interpretation standard of Article 65 of the Civil Code must prevail to protect the recipient's reliance and legal certainty.