Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 91/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding that a fixed-term contract used to bypass early retirement rules is a sham agreement.

Case Number II UKN 91/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that declared a fixed-term employment contract a sham. The applicant had worked under a five-month fixed-term agreement before switching to an indefinite contract to qualify for early retirement, while the employer withdrew social security contributions. The court found the indefinite contract was merely a disguise to circumvent legal requirements, as the initial fixed-term contract prevented the necessary termination conditions from being met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1, 2 i art. 10 ustawy o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; Umowa zawarta w celu obejścia prawa, której celem jest uzyskanie uprawnień do wcześniejszej emerytury, uznawana jest za pozorną czynność prawną.

Keywords

AI generated
sham employment contract early retirement rights circumvention of law fixed term contract indefinite term contract social security contributions cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1 ust. 1, 2 i art. 10 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
art. 233 KPC
art. 3931 pkt 2 KPC
art. 231 KPC
art. 83 § 1 KC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text