Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employer's reasons for dismissal need not match letter wording exactly.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Maria S. against the Regional Court's decision to reinstate her employment. The court found that the employer's three grounds for termination under Article 52 of the Labor Code were substantiated by facts, even if the specific wording in the employer's letter differed slightly from the court's findings. Consequently, the court held that the binding nature of the employer's stated reasons does not require a verbatim match in the judicial assessment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.r.; Art. 30 § 4 k.r.; Art. 52 § 2 k.r.; The reasons cited by an employer for terminating a contract without notice bind the court, but the court is not required to match the specific wording or structure of the employer's letter when determining the facts.