Supreme Court dismissed appeal; rest breaks where driver must supervise passengers do not count as rest time.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal regarding overtime pay for rest breaks. The appellant argued that breaks involving passenger supervision should count as work time, while the employer maintained that only breaks where the driver is completely free from duties qualify. The court ruled that because the driver remained under obligation to ensure safety and supervise the vehicle and passengers, such breaks did not meet the legal definition of rest time, thus upholding the lower court's decision.