Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review, limiting review to procedural violations only, not substantive law errors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Chief Administrative Court against a lower administrative court's decision. The applicant argued that the lower court erred in factually establishing that a building was constructed on land excluded from residential use by the zoning plan. The court ruled that extraordinary review is strictly limited to assessing procedural violations, not substantive legal errors, and that zoning plans are legal norms rather than facts subject to evidentiary review.