Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 83/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's appeal on social security contribution rate, ruling it is a payment dispute not a legal interpretation case.

Case Number II UZ 83/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the lawyer's cassation appeal regarding the social security contribution rate for disabled lawyers. The lower courts had ruled that the contribution should be 100% because the lawyer operates an individual practice, not as an employee. The Court determined the dispute was merely about the specific payment amount rather than the abstract interpretation of the law. Consequently, the appeal was inadmissible because the value of the subject matter did not exceed the statutory threshold for cassation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 476 § 2 KPC: A cassation appeal against a decision setting the amount of social security contributions is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter does not exceed the statutory limit, as such disputes concern specific payments rather than abstract legal interpretation.

Keywords

AI generated
social security contributions cassation admissibility value of subject matter legal interpretation payment dispute KPC cassation threshold disabled lawyers

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
art. 476 § 2 KPC
art. 385 KPC
art. 397 § 2 KPC
art. 25 ustawy z dnia 27 sierpnia 1997 r. o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz o zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych
art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze
art. 60 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text