Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 56/99 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes appeal judgment for lack of evidence on fault and allows statute of limitations defense in second instance.

Case Number II UKN 56/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's judgment because it failed to conduct its own evidence gathering regarding the defendant's fault, relying solely on the first instance record. The defendant argued that the claim was time-barred and that liability should be based on fault rather than strict risk, while the first instance court had ruled on strict liability. The court held that determining fault requires specific evidentiary proceedings and that a statute of limitations defense remains valid even if raised for the first time in the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 415 KC; Art. 382 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 3931 § 1 KPC: A second-instance court must conduct its own evidence proceedings to determine fault; failure to do so violates procedural law, and a statute of limitations defense is admissible in appeal regardless of timing.

Keywords

AI generated
second instance evidence fault liability standard statute of limitations appeal strict liability risk civil procedure violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 415 KC
Art. 435 KC
Art. 382 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 3931 § 1 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text