I PKN 166/99
AI generated
Employee dismissed without notice for illness cannot claim reinstatement if unable to work within six months.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding a claim for reinstatement after his contract was terminated without notice due to prolonged illness. The lower courts found that the employer correctly applied the law because the employee failed to regain work capacity within the six-month statutory period required for reinstatement. Consequently, the court held that the right to reinstatement expired before the employee could demonstrate recovery, rendering the claim inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 53 § 1 pkt 1 KP; Art. 53 § 5 KP: An employee dismissed without notice due to illness is not entitled to reinstatement if they fail to recover work capacity within six months of termination.
Keywords
AI generated
dismissal without notice
illness incapacity
reinstatement claim
six month period
labor law termination
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 53 § 1 pkt 1 KP
Art. 53 § 3 KP
Art. 53 § 5 KP
Art. 8 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 9 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 20 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 393 § 11 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC