Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 164/99 AI generated

Labor dispute where dismissal of an appointed employee via appointment statute is treated as a defective termination of a contract.

Case Number I PKN 164/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a labor dispute involving an employee dismissed from an appointed position. The court found that while the dismissal was procedurally defective, it effectively terminated the employment relationship under the relevant labor code. Consequently, the plaintiff is entitled to damages for defective termination rather than reinstatement or full back pay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 68 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 2 lutego 1996 r. o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks pracy; Art. 45 Kodeksu pracy: A dismissal of an employee appointed under a specific statute, when executed by a successor organ and lacking proper form or cause, is legally equivalent to a defective termination of an employment contract, entitling the employee to damages under Article 45 of the Labor Code.

Keywords

AI generated
appointment statute defective termination labor contract employee dismissal damages for breach labor code provisions procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 68 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 2 lutego 1996 r. o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks pracy
Art. 45 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 69 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 70 § 2 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 30 § 21 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 49 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text