Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 162/99 AI generated

Teacher's salary refund limited to suspension period only when dismissal from profession existed at contract end.

Case Number I PKN 162/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal regarding a withheld salary portion after his employment contract expired. Although the disciplinary proceedings were later dropped and the teacher was acquitted, the court held that Article 84(5) of the Teachers' Charter only allows refunds for the suspension period up to the contract's expiration date. The court reasoned that since a final dismissal order existed at the time the contract ended, no legal basis existed to claim salary for the subsequent period, even if the disciplinary process was eventually abandoned.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 84 ust. 5 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 26 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela; When a final disciplinary dismissal from the profession exists at the time the employment contract expires, the provision allowing for the return of withheld remuneration applies only to the period of suspension up to the expiration date, excluding any time thereafter.

Keywords

AI generated
Teachers Charter dismissal from profession employment contract expiration withheld remuneration disciplinary proceedings salary refund scope cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 84 ust. 5 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 26 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 300 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 57 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 58 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text