Supreme Court dismissed teacher's appeal, ruling non-termination status does not equal contract termination.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected her claim for invalid non-active status transfer. The teacher argued that the transfer, while substantively justified, should be treated as a termination requiring protection under labor law due to her medical leave at the time of notification. The court held that the statutory provision regarding three-month notice applies only to voluntary contract termination, not to the automatic expiration of the contract after six months of non-active status.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 20 ust. 1, 3, 6 Karty Nauczyciela: The transfer of a teacher to non-active status does not constitute the termination of the employment relationship; the contract expires by operation of law after six months, distinct from termination by notice.