III RN 20/99
AI generated
Supreme Court held State's compensation obligation stems from land division decision, not subsequent valuation acts.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the City's appeal against the Governor's decision to set compensation for land expropriated for street expansion. The City argued that the obligation to pay compensation arose only from the specific valuation decisions issued later. The court ruled that the initial land division decision legally created the State's obligation to compensate, making subsequent valuation acts merely executive steps to fulfill that pre-existing duty.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 12 ust. 1, 3 i 5 ustawy o gospodarce gruntami; Art. 56 ust. 1 pkt 4 i ust. 4 tej ustawy: The obligation of the State to pay compensation for land expropriated under a division decision arises from the division decision itself, not from subsequent valuation acts.
Keywords
AI generated
land division decision
State compensation obligation
expropriation valuation
administrative execution
legal basis of debt
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 12 ust. 1, 3 i 5 ustawy z dnia 29 kwietnia 1985 r. o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości
Art. 56 ust. 1 pkt 4 w związku z art. 12 ust. 5 tej ustawy
Art. 56 ust. 4 w związku z art. 12 ust. 5 tej ustawy
Art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 7 Konstytucji RP
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CZP 145/91