Supreme Court dismissed cassation for violation of Art. 65 § 1 KC due to lack of factual doubts regarding employee's intent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment that rejected her claim to return to work. The lower courts established that the employee voluntarily agreed to terminate her employment contract by mutual consent based on witness testimony and her selection of a specific resolution option. The Supreme Court ruled that since the second-instance court factually determined the employee's intent without doubt, the legal provision regarding the interpretation of will could not be violated.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 65 § 1 KC; Art. 300 KP: A violation of the provision concerning the interpretation of the will of the parties may occur only when, in light of the established state of facts, doubts exist regarding the subject and content of the declaration of will made by the party.