Supreme Court dismissed appeal; minor fault justifies warning penalty under Art. 108 § 1 KP.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a warning penalty imposed for unauthorized absence from a selection committee meeting and sudden withdrawal from a shift swap. The plaintiff argued that the employer failed to inform her of the meeting topic and that the Code of Ethics did not constitute material law. The court held that the Code of Ethics is an internal act used to assess fault, and that even minor fault warrants a disciplinary warning under Article 108 § 1 of the Code of Penal Procedure.