Article 203 Commercial Code inapplicable to unilateral termination of employment contract with company board members.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a social services subsidiary against a labor court ruling. The plaintiff, a board member, sought reinstatement after being removed from his vice-president position, which the lower courts deemed equivalent to terminating his employment contract. The court held that Article 203 of the Commercial Code does not apply to unilateral acts terminating employment contracts with board members because such actions must strictly comply with labor law formalities, including written form and proper naming.