Supreme Court dismisses cassation, ruling a farmer retains concurrent social security benefits despite spousal property transfer.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the applicant against the regional social insurance fund. The court found that the applicant, a farmer entitled to concurrent agricultural and employment disability pensions, retained her right to these benefits even after her husband became the sole owner of the farm via a gift from their son. The court rejected the fund's argument that the husband's acquisition of ownership in 1992 deprived the applicant of her concurrent benefit rights, noting that the subsequent tenancy agreement did not alter her entitlement status.