Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 606/98 AI generated

Overtime work does not extend the employment period required for disability pension eligibility under Polish law.

Case Number II UKN 606/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal against a decision denying her disability pension. The court found that the applicant failed to prove five years of qualifying employment within the specific ten-year period preceding her claim. It ruled that overtime work does not extend the nominal employment duration and that non-contributory periods are limited to one-third of the contributory periods within that specific decade.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 2, Art. 33 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 4 ust. 2 ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent: Non-contributory periods are limited to one-third of contributory periods within the relevant decade, and overtime work does not extend the employment period required for pension eligibility.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension eligibility non-contributory periods overtime work recognition ten-year period calculation one-third limitation rule employment duration proof social security contributions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 2 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 33 ust. 1 pkt 5 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 4 ust. 2 of the Act on Revaluation of Pensions and Allowances
Art. 393 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text