Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 124/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed union activist's appeal, ruling labor law protection applies even to intentional misconduct under Art. 32 and 52 KP.

Case Number I PKN 124/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the union activist's cassation appeal regarding his reinstatement to work. The lower court had denied reinstatement due to the employee's intentional failure to inventory materials from a liquidation, citing a conflict with the social-economic purpose of labor law. The Supreme Court held that Article 32 of the Trade Union Law protects employees even when they commit intentional acts listed in Article 52 of the Labor Code, and that the social-economic purpose of the law cannot be used merely to reject reinstatement claims based on such conduct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy: Protection under trade union law extends to intentional misconduct defined in the Labor Code, and the social-economic purpose of the law cannot be used solely to deny reinstatement based on such conduct.

Keywords

AI generated
trade union law protection intentional employee misconduct reinstatement to work social economic purpose of law labor code violations cassation appeal dismissal unfair dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 4771 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 233 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 393 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text