Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 11/99 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects appeal to resolve legal issue in election protest proceedings under general civil code.

Case Number III ZP 11/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to accept a legal question referred by the Court of Appeal regarding the interpretation of election protest laws. The Court of Appeal had sought a ruling on whether a procedural violation alone suffices for invalidating a council member's election or if it must have affected the outcome. The Supreme Court decided that the specific election ordinance acts as lex specialis, requiring strict adherence to its unique procedural timelines and two-instance structure, which would be compromised by a Supreme Court review under general civil code rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 390 § 1 KPC; Art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym: The general procedural code's provision for Supreme Court legal question resolution does not apply to election protest proceedings, which are governed exclusively by the specific election ordinance as lex specialis.

Keywords

AI generated
election protest proceedings lex specialis principle Supreme Court legal question election ordinance validity procedural timeline strictness two-instance court system civil code applicability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 390 § 1 KPC
art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 58 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 16 lipca 1998 r. Ordynacja wyborcza
art. 61 ust. 2 i 3 Ordynacji wyborczej
art. 60 ust. 1 Ordynacji wyborczej

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text