Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 16/99 AI generated

Tax deduction for multi-family housing construction denied due to specific ownership intent requirements not met.

Case Number III RN 16/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision against the tax authority's decision regarding income tax deductions. The taxpayers argued they qualified for a deduction on construction costs, but the court found their intent was to acquire a specific individual apartment unit rather than a shared multi-family building. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirement for the building to constitute the taxpayer's own or fractional co-ownership was not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych; The deduction for construction costs is permissible only if the building constitutes the taxpayer's own property or fractional co-ownership, excluding cases where the intent was to acquire a specific individual unit within the complex.

Keywords

AI generated
income tax deduction multi-family housing co-ownership requirements extraordinary revision tax authority decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r.
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 217 Konstytucji RP
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text