Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 687/98 AI generated

Unknown traffic law knowledge by a cyclist constitutes gross negligence, barring work accident benefits under Polish law.

Case Number II UKN 687/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a decision denying work accident compensation to a cyclist who collided with a car. The court found that entering a main road without a bicycle license and violating traffic rules constituted gross negligence, even though the cyclist claimed ignorance of the regulations. Consequently, the statutory exclusion for gross negligence under the Work Accident Insurance Act applied, overriding the lower court's finding of ordinary negligence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; If the sole cause of a traffic accident involving an employee driving a vehicle is ignorance of traffic regulations, such conduct constitutes gross negligence and serves as a basis for excluding the right to benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
gross negligence traffic regulations work accident insurance bicycle license exclusion of benefits ignorance of law road safety

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 78 ust. 1 prawa o ruchu drogowym
ustawa z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. – prawo o ruchu drogowym
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III PRN 19/76

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text