Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 80/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on vacation compensation, allowing partial payment adjustment and rejecting procedural errors.

Case Number I PKN 80/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal by increasing the awarded vacation compensation from 583.44 zł to 737.88 zł while dismissing the remainder of the cassation. The court found that the employer could legally require the use of current vacation during a three-month notice period, but the plaintiff's claim for equivalent pay for unused leave was incorrect. Furthermore, the court rejected procedural arguments regarding the statute of limitations and the amendment of the claim, ruling that the plaintiff could not have filed suit earlier with the correct basis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 170 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 383, 393 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: The employer may require the use of current vacation during a three-month notice period without granting equivalent pay, and claims for such equivalent are inadmissible; procedural amendments of the claim are inadmissible in appeal and cassation proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
vacation compensation notice period equivalent pay statute of limitations cassation procedure labor dispute procedural amendment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 170 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 383 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 98-100 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 100 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 393 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text