Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 63/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal when second-instance court exceeds appeal limits but total amount remains under statutory threshold.

Case Number II UZ 63/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the total disputed amount remained below the statutory threshold for admissibility. Although the Court of Appeal exceeded the appellant's specific appeal limits by ruling on the full overpayment sum, the final monetary value was insufficient to trigger a cassation review. The court held that the appeal was inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code regardless of the procedural error regarding the scope of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 378 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC: When a second-instance court rules on a claim partially outside the appeal scope, the subject matter value for cassation is the amount adjudicated by that court; however, if this value remains below the statutory threshold, the cassation is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation admissibility subject matter value second instance court appeal scope limits statutory threshold overpayment dispute social insurance benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 378 § 1 KPC
Art. 385 KPC
Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 397 KPC
Art. 393 § 18-19 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text