Lease of a state enterprise does not transfer trademark rights to the lessee as a legal successor.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Patent Office's decision to invalidate a trademark registration. The applicant argued that a lease agreement transferred the right to use the trademark to the lessee after the lessor's liquidation, claiming this violated public order by monopolizing a shared mark. The court held that a lease does not create legal succession to trademark rights, especially when the lessor lacked registration rights, and that the privatization agreement explicitly assigned the right to the lessee.