I PKN 70/99
AI generated
Written form required only for notifying disciplinary action, not for its imposition itself.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a disciplinary fine imposed on a municipal employee. The employee argued the fine was invalid due to procedural errors and exceeding his job scope, while the employer maintained the order was justified under labor law. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for written form applies solely to the notification of the fine, not its actual imposition, provided the two-week limitation period was respected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 109 § 1, § 2 of the Labor Code; Art. 110, § 1, Art. 112 § 1 of the Labor Code: The obligation to use written form applies only to the notification of a disciplinary sanction to the employee, not to the act of imposing the sanction itself.
Keywords
AI generated
disciplinary sanction
written form requirement
notification vs imposition
Labor Code provisions
procedural deadline
municipal employee
cassation appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 109 § 1 of the Labor Code
Art. 109 § 2 of the Labor Code
Art. 110 of the Labor Code
Art. 112 § 1 of the Labor Code