Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling employment contract substance overrides name under Labor Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against a lower court's finding of an employment relationship. The plaintiff argued that successive service contracts were civil agreements, while the court determined the actual work performed and conditions established an employment relationship under the Labor Code. The court ruled that the substance of the agreement, including work performed under supervision, prevails over the contract's label, and no error in interpretation occurred.