Supreme Court allows appeal despite erroneous notice, ruling administrative body must evaluate requests under Art. 127 § 3 KPA.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Minister's decision to reject the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff had filed a request for removal of a legal violation instead of a formal complaint, following an erroneous notice in the first-instance decision. The court held that the administrative body was obligated to evaluate the request under Article 127 § 3 of the Administrative Procedure Code, regardless of the incorrect procedural instruction provided.