Cassation dismissed because the case's essence is the correction of a work certificate, not the determination of employment periods for pension purposes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a worker against a judgment ordering the correction of his work certificate. Although the lower courts incorrectly characterized the suit as merely an inquiry into employment periods for future pension benefits, the Supreme Court held that the legal essence of the case is the request to correct the certificate itself. Consequently, the cassation was inadmissible under Article 393(6) of the Code of Civil Procedure because the right to appeal does not exist for this specific type of request.