II UKN 601/98
AI generated
Social security court dismisses appeal; non-payment with offsetting does not equal voluntary withdrawal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal against a decision terminating her social security coverage due to unpaid premiums. The applicant argued that the social security fund offsetting her arrears from her pension constituted a waiver of voluntary coverage, but the lower courts failed to properly evaluate the evidentiary record. The court ruled that such offsetting actions do not legally equate to voluntary withdrawal under the statute, necessitating a full evidentiary review before applying the termination clause.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3 ust. 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 50 ust. 1 tej ustawy: Non-payment of premiums does not constitute voluntary withdrawal if arrears are offset from social benefits.
Keywords
AI generated
social security termination
voluntary withdrawal presumption
premium offsetting
social security fund
evidentiary review requirement
non-payment defense
casation dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 50 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 108 § 2 w związku z art. 393 § 19 KPC