Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 601/98 AI generated

Social security court dismisses appeal; non-payment with offsetting does not equal voluntary withdrawal.

Case Number II UKN 601/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal against a decision terminating her social security coverage due to unpaid premiums. The applicant argued that the social security fund offsetting her arrears from her pension constituted a waiver of voluntary coverage, but the lower courts failed to properly evaluate the evidentiary record. The court ruled that such offsetting actions do not legally equate to voluntary withdrawal under the statute, necessitating a full evidentiary review before applying the termination clause.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 ust. 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 50 ust. 1 tej ustawy: Non-payment of premiums does not constitute voluntary withdrawal if arrears are offset from social benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
social security termination voluntary withdrawal presumption premium offsetting social security fund evidentiary review requirement non-payment defense casation dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 50 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 108 § 2 w związku z art. 393 § 19 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text