Supreme Court dismisses cassation; husband insured as collaborator under Social Insurance Act Art. 26.1 & 2.1
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Sylwester M. against the Social Insurance Institution's decision to insure him as a collaborator. The lower courts established that M. worked alongside his wife, who operated a shop and kiosk, based on witness testimony from M. and his sister given during an administrative inspection. The court ruled that the appeal's claim regarding unexamined facts about a second sales point was irrelevant to the core issue of M.'s status as a collaborator, thus upholding the lower court's free evaluation of evidence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 26 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; The court may rely on evidence gathered during administrative inspections without requiring additional procedural hearings if the facts are sufficiently established by the parties' own testimony.