Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review against administrative court ruling's reasoning as inadmissible.

The Supreme Court rejected an extraordinary review filed by the First President of the Supreme Court against the reasoning portion of a ruling by the Chief Administrative Court. The applicant argued that the reasoning contained a gross violation of the Act on the Return of Property Lost Due to Martial Law. The court held that extraordinary review is legally limited to challenging the operative part of a judgment, not its reasoning, as no specific statute permits such a challenge.