Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 137/98 AI generated

Supreme Court allows extension of filing fee deadline under Civil Procedure Act via Administrative Court Act gap clause.

Case Number III RN 137/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the Lower Administrative Court's rejection of a request to extend the deadline for paying a court fee. The applicant argued that his illness prevented timely payment, while the lower court cited the finality of the fee rejection decision. The court ruled that Article 59 of the Administrative Court Act mandates applying Civil Procedure Act provisions for procedural gaps, thereby permitting the extension.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 58 KPA; Art. 59 ust. 1 ustawy o NSA: Where the Administrative Court Act does not regulate a specific procedural matter, the Civil Procedure Act applies by analogy, allowing for the extension of procedural deadlines upon request.

Keywords

AI generated
extension of deadline filing fee payment Administrative Court Act Civil Procedure Act procedural gap finality of decision right to court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 58 KPA
art. 59 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
art. 27 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
art. 35 ust. 3 ustawy o NSA
art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy o NSA
art. 168 §1 KPC
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 39313 KPC
art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text